Jed Hallam

<div style="background-color: none transparent;"><a href="http://www.rsspump.com/?web_widget/rss_widget/twitter_widget" title="web widget">Twitter Widget</a></div>

Why real life matters

“As we leave behind the 20th century, it is almost as if we have come full circle back to the village where everyone potentially knows your business” Zeynep Tufekci, Wired Nov 09, P.113.

This is true. And you know what is also true? The internet won’t change our lives, it will add to our lives. It will contribute value, it will stick on, it will plaster over queasy relationships and it will make us all more knowledgeable, more aware, more… socially intelligent.

I recently turned off push updates from Foursquare, mainly because Michael Litman seems to want to be the mayor of everywhere. Let’s not see this as a slight, Michael is using a new technology and trying to smash home the social element. The only reason I became a bit irritated is because he’s in London and I’m in Leeds. That’s quite a commute for just one beer.

Let’s jump right back to my original point; the internet, and more specifically, social media, wont change the world. MySpace changed the music industry (didn’t), Facebook changed our lives (didn’t), Twitter changed the way we connect with people (didn’t really). All that the aforementioned three have done is add value to existing relationships. Yeah, sure, they may have facilitated the creation of a few relationships, in fact, they may have created 30 billion* relationships, but what the actual relationship is built on is similarities. Familiarisations. The same things ‘real life’ friendships are built on. All social networks do is add another level of communication to the mix.

Let’s look at real life for a second: Jason and myself** have been best friends for over ten years, I love the guy, he’s great, but if he text me every fifteen minutes I’d end up posting him something horrible in the mail. As things are, we talk about once a week, we text a few times a week and I check his Facebook profile probably once a day to see what’s going on. If he joins Twitter I’ll follow him, but all it will do is add value to our relationship. I’ll know more about him (but only as much as he wants me to know, but that’s a conversation for another time) and I’ll know what he’s up to immediately. It won’t alter our relationship, it will add to it. If he starts using Foursquare, or Dopplr, or Songkick, or Wave – all that will change is the way we connect, not our relationship. We’ll still be friends with embarrassing stories we’d prefer kept off of the internet. We’ll still be normal friends.

But wait, I hear you cry, what when relationships are the other way around? OK, so I’m friends with Tim Hoang. There, I said it, now everyone knows. Well, I met Tim on Twitter about a year ago. In fact, and I quote, he called me ‘a whore’, which was nice. I’ve probably @’d him 20 times in a year, I’ve probably seen him eight times this year, I’ve spoken to him about 40 times on the phone, I’ve text him (probably) thousands of (drunken and inappropriate) messages. See, and this is the point, we met online, but because we’re similar folk, we bonded offline. A ‘relationship’ in social media or public relations as a whole is only worth anything if it’s a friendship. Let’s not ‘work a room’ or ‘manipulate our contacts’ let’s work with our friends and build something meaningful.

Next week on Sesame Street, the number four.

* This is not fact, although please expect it to be the number quoted at some point in a UK national newspaper.

** Real life example.

** I’ve made a few grammatical edits to this post, nothing more, nothing less. **

  • i look this site and i think it's good site!
  • katie
    Jed,

    Interesting post. I suppose in some ways your right. Social media is really just another form on communication among existing relationships. But what defines a relationship? In my opinion, communication is the cornerstone of any relationship in life. The arrival of social media has added a new platform for communication. It is such a force that is has changed the very nature of communication and in essence changed the very nature of our relationships. Who we are on twitter, facebook, myspace is a representation of who we are in our lives.

    Social media does add value to our relationships, but it also does alter them. Ask any girl who has yelled at her boyfriend for that "suspicious wallpost" another girl left on his wall. A fight that would have never existed if facebook wasnt around.
  • Why real life matters – http://bit.ly/3qcMBU


    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • This debate, while having good points, is all coming off a bit 'high school', don't you think?

    The original point was about how the Internet is or is not changing the way we form and maintain relationships, yes?

    Jed, I think the disconnect here is when you use the word relationship as interchangeable with friendship. They are different, and on that point, I 100% agree with Davies.

    The whole PR clique thing and public debate about whether or not an overzealous grad should be taken out for a beer is just playground gossip.
  • Andy Vincent
    Christ, that was an essay.
  • Andy Vincent
    So this is long and responds to all the points from both the blog and the following piece of banter regarding who hangs out with who -

    Part 1:

    I totally disagree that the internet isn't a life-changing tool, I've rated it with the printing press before in terms of it's revolutionary power - it's a hugely influential tool that has already changed the world (i'm sure you already know this).

    Foursquare is currently available for lots of cities across the US and London, specifically London, not Leeds. While people in Leeds may sign up, it's no surprise that on a tool aimed at London users, most of the updates will be somewhat London-centric (and i'm sure you know this too).

    I fundamentally disagree with the main statements (after you get back to your main points) - Myspace (and it's spin-offs) DID change the music industry. Artists like Lily Allen, The Arctic Monkey's and an infinite amount of other bands across the morass of musical genres have used Myspace as a jump off to previously unreachable fanbases - it only takes a cursory look to see artists like You Me At Six and Paramore alongside the aforementioned using the social media tools that are available to make music careers for themselves. Facebook is somewhat more contentious but I will say that I have personally used it to meet up with people that I never thought I would speak to again - both my parents (fast approaching retirement age) have also rekindled old friendships - friendships that I refuse to believe would have reformed without the 'book.

    I tend to agree with Jed in that people are acting in very similar ways online as they are offline but people aren't believing it will change behavioural characteristics (outside of the amount of hours we spend doing different tasks each day) but the reach of our communication. We've had e-mail for some time and that was great but it's only in recent years we've had the ability to communicate anything that we wanted (except large physical objects) instantaneously. I think the development of Wave highlights this new level of reach and diversity - while "Jason" may be great, if you need to send a whole working document to Jason in Singapore and it just so happens that you haven't physically seen Jason in 5 years then tools like Wave are going to help ease your working relationship.Perhaps you're right, perhaps these tools aren't the biggest change for you and the friends you go to the pub with but then that's not their sole use, the opportunities reach far and wide.

    It makes sense to make friends, I'm friends with Litman (amongst others from the "community"), our friendship was probably kindled online, developed offline and is now maintained throughout the two - I also have people that I am not likely to meet offline perhaps because they live absolutely shitting miles away - on the other side of the world perhaps. I would still consider that 'relationship' to have value and more importantly, be meaningful. It's meaningful not because I can manipulate it, but because it's nice to communicate - the whole of human civilisation is built on interaction which is why the printing press, telephone, radio and television were all such MASSIVE creations. The internet (and social media) is (and are) no different

    Part 2:

    In terms of the exclusive club - it is an exclusive club - It doesn't have a members list but there certainly is a sort minor in-crowd which is developed inside the communities - I don't personally think it's an issue - it's built out of respect for those people that attend - as the original post said, I'm pretty sure most PR grads aren't losing sleep over it, they're probably just hanging out with their non-internet friends but, while you don't need to be friends with every PR graduate but maybe, just maybe (thank you lottery) some of them have something interesting to say.

    Now, i'm off for a beer with @Sean367 at one of the many members clubs around London built just for us.
  • @tim - if you didn't want to meet for that beer, you could have just said. man this is embarassing.

    @michael - I'm going to be somebody someday, you just watch.
  • I’ve just been reading @jedhallam’s kick ass blog and got a boner http://is.gd/4scJa


    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • Interesting post Jed.

    I'm not sure that I agree that the internet will not change lives. It has certainly changed behaviours and the development path of various technologies. That said it changes different people's lives in different ways, for us hyper-connected peeps it makes more impact than say my Dad. That said my (very nearly)septuagenarian Pops uses Skype to keep in touch with family and is plotting out the family tree using the plethora of geneology sites.

    What the internet does is enble relationship that perhaps would not have existed to be started and given a chance to develop. Take you and Timbo. Pre-internet days, it is possible that you would've meet at some PR and journo networking do. You would have got along wonderfully but that might have been it. You may have exchanged business cards and called the other up when you were in town to meet for a beer. Or perhaps not. Yes, the important thing is that you had enough in common to build a relationship, but due to distance without the internet would it be where it is now?

    Sorry, waffling on a bit this morning - point is this. Yes real life is important, meeting someone cements the relationship, but the internet enables us to develop budding relationships and keep them alive despite the lack of physical proximity.

    Apologies if this comment makes it sound like you and Time should be annoucing your engagement in the near future :)
  • Could someone do me a favour? Read @jedhallam’s post (http://bit.ly/4j31H9) and write a 227 character summary for me. It’s way too long.


    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • As BT used to say ‘It’s good to talk’ – thanks to @timhoang @litmanlive @stedavies @CMRLee – http://bit.ly/IxOSg


    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • Disagree with a lot of that. Social networks haven't 'changed the world'? D'you reckon? They've completely changed the way businesses are strategising and also have helped galvinise public opinion quicker than ever - think Trafigura and Jan Moir from the last week alone! Plus they've only just started - wait a couple of years for even more impact.

    Plus you need to work on your apostrophes - won't not wont etc.

    Otherwise, keep blogging. Keep the faith.
    C
  • I turn my back for one minute and my blog goes all world war III ;-) — http://bit.ly/IxOSg


    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • Damn that typo!
  • "‘relationship’ in social media or public relations as a whole is only worth anything if it’s a friendship."

    Completely disagree. There's something called commercial relationships. These are the types of relationships that usually pay the bills.

    Come on Jed, it's a bit naive to think you can work in a business industry (like PR) and only work with the people you call friends.

    I've worked with suppliers, journos, bloggers etc in the day job whom I like, admire and respect, but not once did I consider us freinds.
  • It's no criticism. We've all got a circle of friends we choose to socialise with more than others so I see that as what I was alluding to about the exclusive club. Every now and then we cast the net a bit wider and that's how new friendships evolve.

    No I don't expect you, I or anyone else for that matter to meet up with every PR graduate but it's good to keep that network open.

    Good debate. Nice one.
  • Litman - I hang around and go for drink with who I class as 'friends'. If you think this is an 'exclusive club' or a 'tight niche' than so be it - I'm okay with that as i think many people would be. I hang around with people I get on with and like - so sue me - and read into that what you will.

    With regards to your point about the hypothetical @sean376 - do you expect me to meet up with every PR graduate because you've said I should do? I try and help out in dissertations when I can and will help most people (ask any work experience whose ever come through the PN doors or any of the grads) but that is my choice whether I do or not. I can't physically meet up with everyone I've connected with, and to be honest I don't want to.

    Jed - top post and thanks for stirring up some much needed debate
  • Jed, interesting one this.

    About foursquare - I'm fascinated by how software changes physical process. People are going to different places, doing different things because of what their friends are doing and that for me is truly mindblowing. I'm not interested in becoming the mayor of everywhere, that requires repeat visits and is often somewhere part of your routine, eg work, your local coffee shop so I disagree with that point.

    Slamming the 'social' home? I'm keeping who I add as a friend on foursquare deliberately tight. As with most who are really trying to integrate the service in to their routine and see its value. My criteria is that I need to have met you in person and if I saw your location update come up somewhere local, I'd like to go for a drink with you. That's in stark contrast to people to a lot of people I follow who are geographically dispersed worldwide or friends I have on Facebook from University who are mostly out of London. So i'm making myself locationally available to the people who are themselves 'local'. The people who I think would care and would want to come join me at a bar.

    I see huge potential with foursquare but enough about that.. on to yours and Tim's other points..

    Tim - It is an exclusive club. It's a very tight niche that it's perceived you need to be at a certain level to be a part of. Agreed it's a juggling act with time but you never know what's going to happen to @sean376 as a hypothetical example and to not give him the time is because he's not part of the 'gang'. I was Sean a year ago and I still don't feel a whole lot different.

    Agreed with Tim that there's far more weak ties than there are friendships in PR. There's probably equally as many fake friendships. And then you know someone vaguely through someone else or you've seen their tweets roll on by. You don't know them though. Let's say I know the very large majority of the people I follow, which infact I do. I deliberately try and keep it that way.

    However, I could only say that I really *know* a very small percentage of that following. The people I could call up at any given hour without ill feeling, the ones I could text a joke or send an email to and get a response back. There's value in the people I follow but have a weaker tie with but that's on a different level to me than a more personal value. I could call you up Jed and have a chat about nothing special (when you pick up) but how many other people in PR could/should I be able to do that with? Everyone I follow? No.

    I think i'm done with ranting.
  • Some good points raised. i've pretty much let everyone know that I only really amke the effort to meet up with Twitter users that i actually like (i.e. would hang out with regardless of whether they were on Twitter/ in PR / etc). It's not an exclusive club or anything, it's just that I barely have time to see the girlfriend, never mind @Sean376 the PR graduate who's just moved down to London for a bit of work experience.

    Not sure if I agree with this quote though: "A ‘relationship’ in social media or public relations as a whole is only worth anything if it’s a friendship" - you can have 'weaker' relationships, just because you aren't BFF doesn't mean you can't speak to them and ask for advice. For me it's knowing which of those relationships i should spend time maintaining.

    Also the blog made me reminisce about the first time I met you online: http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/wadds/2008/04/30/everyone-needs-twitter-well-those-that-are-interested-in-using-it-properly/

    i love you hallam.
  • My blog: Why Real Life Matters – http://bit.ly/IxOSg #pr #media #socialmedia #relationships


    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

blog comments powered by Disqus